Methodology: 3/5
Usefulness: 1.5/5
Wang L, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2022 Mar;175(3):344-351.
Question and Methods:Â Using a convenience sample of 100 patients out of 4436 going for right heart catheterization in 2 US academic hospitals, the authors wanted to validate the accuracy of quantitative and qualitative point-of-care ultrasonography assessment of jugular venous pressure (JVP) in predicting elevated central venous pressure (CVP) on invasive monitoring.Â
Findings: the authors found that a uJVP measurement of >8cm with patients in a semi-recumbent position is 72.7% sensitive (95% CI, 57.2% to 85.0%) and 78% specific (95% CI, 65.6% to 88.4%) for a CVP >10mmHg, giving an ROC of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.76 to 0.92). This increased to 94.6% specific (95% CI, 85.1% to 98.9) in the upright position. Both had high interrater reliability of 0.97 (95% CI, 0.84 to 0.98). Â
Limitations:Â very narrow pre-selected population. Only 3 expert sonographers used to take the measurements. Lack of calibration of the right heart catheter measurements. Significant over/under estimation in obese patients. Did not account for vascular or valvular pathology.Â
Interpretation: The use of uJVP does not bring substantial additional clinical information to guide decision making or management in the emergency department of patients potentially suffering from congestive heart failure. Â
JC Supervisor: Dr. Debra Eagles
Authors
-
-
Dr. Rosenberg is an emergency physician at the Ottawa Hospital, associate professor at the University of Ottawa, and Director of the Digital Scholarship and Knowledge Dissemination Program.
View all posts -
Dr. Debra Eagles obtained her degree and residency training in Emergency Medicine from the University of Ottawa. She has a special interest in altered mental status, both dementia and delirium, frailty, and geriatric trauma.
View all posts
Trackbacks/Pingbacks